8,725 kWh
Approximate annual household electricity consumption.
Real solar design case study · Central Scotland
This anonymised four-bedroom detached home used around 8,725 kWh of electricity a year and already had significant electrical demand from an 8 kW heat pump, electric hot water and an electric vehicle.
The property
The property was a four-bedroom detached home in Central Scotland. For privacy, the customer name, exact town, street and postcode have been deliberately omitted.
Annual electricity consumption was approximately 8,725 kWh — substantially higher than many homes because several major energy requirements had already been electrified.
Key design data
Approximate annual household electricity consumption.
A 9.0 kWp array using twenty 450 W panels.
Two 9.4 kWh home batteries were proposed to provide substantial storage capacity for the high-demand household.
A larger hybrid inverter was selected rather than designing the system around a standard 3.68 kW G98-sized output.
Roof pitch was approximately 34 degrees.
The proposed array used both north-east and south-west roof areas.
Panel layout
The available roof space did not present one single ideal south-facing plane.
Instead, the proposed twenty-panel array was divided across two roof orientations:
A split-orientation array can spread generation across a broader part of the day rather than concentrating all production around one peak period.
The important question was therefore not simply which roof direction was theoretically best, but how the available roof could be used sensibly alongside the home's unusually high electrical demand.
Battery strategy
Large batteries are not automatically good system design. Storage capacity needs a reason.
In this home, however, annual electricity consumption was already approximately 8,725 kWh and demand included space heating, hot water and vehicle charging.
Two 9.4 kWh batteries provided a combined nominal storage capacity of 18.8 kWh.
That created substantially more opportunity to retain daytime solar generation for later household use and to make use of lower-cost electricity periods where suitable tariffs were available.
The battery decision therefore followed the demand profile rather than being added simply because larger storage looked attractive on a quotation.
Heat pump demand
The property used an approximately 8 kW air-source heat pump for heating.
That does not mean the heat pump continuously consumes 8 kW of electricity, but it does mean heating forms a significant part of the home's wider electrical-energy strategy.
Heat-pump households can have substantial winter electricity demand at precisely the time of year when solar production is lowest.
Solar and battery proposals for these homes therefore need to be considered against annual demand and seasonal behaviour rather than assuming summer solar output represents the whole year.
Electric vehicle
The presence of an electric vehicle added another significant and flexible electricity load.
Where the vehicle is at home during solar-generation periods, excess electricity that might otherwise be exported can potentially be used for charging.
That creates a different design question from a low-demand property: rather than asking only how much solar the house itself can consume immediately, the vehicle may provide another useful destination for daytime generation.
Charging patterns, tariffs and vehicle availability still matter, but the EV was an important part of the demand picture.
Inverter decision
A common domestic solar threshold is 3.68 kW per phase under the standard G98 connection process.
This property had a 9.0 kWp proposed array and high household demand, so designing the system around a 3.68 kW inverter purely to remain within that simpler threshold would have imposed a significant limitation on the proposed installation.
A 7 kW hybrid inverter was therefore specified as part of the design.
That meant the grid-connection requirements needed to be considered through the G99 process rather than assuming a standard G98 notification would be sufficient.
G99
Larger inverter capacities can require approval from the local distribution network operator before unrestricted operation or export is permitted.
For this system, the 7 kW inverter meant the proposed installation required G99 consideration.
That matters because an attractive solar design on paper is not complete until the network-connection position is understood.
Grid limitations can affect inverter settings, export capacity and, in some cases, whether the proposed design needs to be altered.
What this case demonstrates
A household using 8,725 kWh a year has a very different energy profile from a low-consumption home.
The array used both north-east and south-west roof areas because system design involves the usable property as a whole.
The 18.8 kWh battery capacity was supported by substantial household electricity demand rather than being chosen in isolation.
Heat pumps increase the importance of annual and seasonal electricity demand when judging solar and battery performance.
Vehicle charging can create another productive use for solar electricity when the car is available during generation periods.
A larger inverter may make G99 approval part of the system-design process before installation can proceed as proposed.
The wider lesson
Twenty panels alone do not explain the design.
Neither does a 7 kW inverter, an 18.8 kWh battery bank or the presence of a heat pump.
The design only starts to make sense when those factors are considered together:
That is why Tom Solar's starting point is the property and its energy demand rather than a predetermined package of equipment.
Considering solar?
Your home may need a much smaller system than this example — or it may have similarly high electricity demand.
The useful question is not whether this particular design should be copied. It is why each part of the design was chosen for this particular property.
An independent survey provides the evidence needed to answer the same questions for your own home.
Privacy note: This case study uses genuine system-design information from a real residential solar assessment. Customer-identifying information, including the name, exact location, street and postcode, has been deliberately omitted.